[WBEL-users] Fast system clock
Johnny Hughes
mailing-lists at hughesjr.com
Sat Feb 24 10:49:20 CST 2007
On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 13:10 +0000, Francies Moore wrote:
> >
> > Is the CentOS install running the same kernel version as the Whitebox install
> > was running?
> >
> >
> Hi Scott
>
> It was running the latest 2.6.9.42 kernel from CentOS but I have
> reverted it to the original WBEL kernel 2.6.9(whatever - sorry the box
> isn't here) and the time then stayed nearer to being correct, although
> it was slowly gaining when I left it last night.
>
> Incidentally Knoppix 3.8.1 was unusable on this box as it was "too fast"
> - each keypress caused immediate repeating and so even the shell could
> not be used (kernel 2.6.11).
>
> Looks like I have a box which don't like kernel 2.6... Maybe I should
> try WBEL3 or CentOS 3 on it next week (or FC1) - it would be nice to be
> able to deploy this system usefully.
>
> (I will post my Up2date errors later so as not to confuse the issue!)
>
> Thanks
>
> Francies
clock=pit
or
clock=pmtmr
or
clock=tsc
on the kernel line might help (tsc is the default)
http://kb.vmware.com/KanisaPlatform/Publishing/329/1420_f.SAL_Public.html
(that link is for vmware, but it is applicable to normal machines too)
also check for updated bios from the motherboard manufacturer.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://beau.org/pipermail/whitebox-users/attachments/20070224/53cef983/attachment.bin
More information about the Whitebox-users
mailing list